Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Cornered

Pakistanis have always been wary of the army and its cohorts. Recently they have become the brunt of all misfortunes and conspiracies. Our intelligence agency has been accused of a long list of criminal activities including the memogate scandal,abduction of “missing persons” ,extra judicial killings,links with militants like the Taliban and paying off political parties. Human right activists have blamed the Pakistani army for violating human rights. But the threat of such an institution becomes real when the common man starts fearing for his security from their watchful eyes. One such example was the accusation regarding the military’s alleged participation in Shia killings in Baluchistan,KP and FATA and most recently in Gilgit.

Various incidents and events have been presented as evidence of army’s involvement in the latest incident. It was said that the terrorists were dressed in military uniform,the most visual proof of some connection to the army. However,uniforms can be purchased from any costume shop. The uniform was used to give the insurgents legitimacy to stop the bus. If the army was involved in sectarian killings why would it in right sense of mind,make such a blatant error? It would be better to appear as inconspicuous as possible. Secondly,the killings took place in an area with high military presence. The escape of these terrorists does appear dubious. But then,perhaps the uniforms were also meant to fool the real army personnel.  Worst of all,the army has merely offered to probe into the matter. Their silence is ironically incriminating them even more. But in sensitive matters,the army and intelligence operations are not supposed to disclose information. The silence of the army could also be to protect its people and not add more fuel to the current controversies.

Monday, March 5, 2012

US, Pakistan and pipeline politics

Pipeline politics 

My word, are we showcasing some guts in the Iran-Pakistan pipeline episode! Hina Rabbani Khar’s riposte to Hillary Clinton’s ‘threats’ over the IP project was not only valiant she even made it sound realistic. Last week the US hierarchy – in a class ROFL moment – labeled the IP pipeline as a “bad idea”. And this week they are touting Iran as an “unreliable partner”…the sheer irony is painfully amusing. The US lecturing about the reliability of partners is like Lucas Papademos giving a tutorial on controlling debt crises or Veena Malik giving instructions on wearing hijaabs.

So what is your idea of a reliable partner Mrs Clinton? Someone who doesn’t give a rabbit about your energy shortage? One who can’t stop meddling in your internal affairs and wants you to align yourself dutifully to its policies even if it’s bound to be detrimental for your own self? Or someone who kills innocent soldiers and civilians and then doesn’t bother to do as much as apologise, for courtesy’s sake? Of the intriguing (read comical) verbiage served up by the US Secretary of State one particular statement stood out. “As we are ratcheting up pressure on Iran, it seems somewhat inexplicable that Pakistan would be trying to negotiate a pipeline,” Hillary Clinton said. With Pakistan finding itself in a deep hole as far as the energy predicament is concerned, fulfilling half of its energy needs via gas and running out of channels to quench the need of the aforementioned gas, is it really that ‘inexplicable’ Mrs Clinton that Pakistan would want to negotiate a pipeline with a neighbouring country that it has friendly terms with? Plus, the alternative that you’ve been giving us, the TAPI (Turkmenistan Afghanistan Pakistan India) pipeline has taken a nosedive into oblivion, primarily because a certain country has ensured that the A in TAPI borders on a war-torn fragile zone and definitely no way near the periphery of safety. 

Will China step in the Iran crisis?

Beijing may be reluctant to intervene in the Iran crisis. But if an Israeli strike seems imminent, there are several things it can do to pressure Tehran. This coming week,...

Beijing may be reluctant to intervene in the Iran crisis. But if an Israeli strike seems imminent, there are several things it can do to pressure Tehran.

This coming week, U.S. President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will hold a crucial meeting on how to confront the Iranian nuclear problem. It’s doubtful that the United States and Israel will see eye-to-eye on the potential use of force, but any friction between the two could have an upside: fearing an Israeli airstrike, China may be more willing to use its own influence to pressure Tehran.

The argument Netanyahu is likely to make is that, as Iran draws closer to a nuclear weapons capability, Israel’s window of opportunity to conduct a successful strike is closing. As a result, Israel will agree not to attack only if it obtains a firm guarantee that Washington will act militarily down the road, assuming that sanctions continue to prove ineffective. If the U.S. can’t supply such a pledge, “Israeli leaders may well choose to act while they still can.”

Read more...

Apologetic about Balochistan?

Balochistan these days is making headlines and all patriotic elements are feeling deeply perturbed over the worsening security situation in Balochistan owing to excessive interference by several foreign powers. The print and electronic media instead of playing a positive role and highlighting the true facts is reinforcing misperceptions and portraying Balochistan as a lost case. Runaway dissident Baloch leaders spewing venom against Pakistan are given lot of space by our print and electronic media, particularly Geo channel. They are allowed to spit poison on Pakistan and to preach independence of Balochistan and no pointed questions are asked. This is exactly what the adversaries of Pakistan wish for and is in harmony with propaganda of western media. While our print and electronic media is feverishly engaged in tarnishing the image of Army and ISI on the basis of human rights violations, foreign media blames the two premier organizations on charges of abetting cross border terrorism in Afghanistan, India and Occupied Kashmir and their linkage with Afghan Taliban.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Pakistan to continue projects with Iran despite US pressure

Pakistan’s top leadership on Thursday underlined the country’s commitment to pursue energy projects with Iran, including a multi-billion dollar gas pipeline, despite growing pressure from the US to abandon such...

Pakistan’s top leadership on Thursday underlined the country’s commitment to pursue energy projects with Iran, including a multi-billion dollar gas pipeline, despite growing pressure from the US to abandon such ventures.

“We have bilateral relations with Iran and we are a sovereign country. We will do whatever is in the interests of our country. There is no perception of a threat,” Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani said.

He made the remarks while responding to a question about US threats to energy projects with Iran, including the pipeline and ventures to import electricity, on “Prime Minister Online”, a monthly TV show in which he interacts with the public.

Manufacturing disasters in Pakistan’s industries

Pakistan manufacturing industry has been to hell and back. With most of the industries allocated to India, Pakistan started its industry from scratch and gradually built it way to the top. Established in 1952, the Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC) was set up to invest in industries that required heavy capital injections, long gestation periods and advanced skills and knowledge. Our industry expanded from small scale industries like flour mills and rice husking industries to heavy industries like cement, jute, steel and fertilizer industry. 

However, the growth in the 60’s was offset by the nationalization process introduced by Bhutto in 1972. It was aimed at distributing the wealth of the 22 rich families amongst the rest of the people. The management of these industries was handed over to bureaucrats instead of professionals. The ensuing corruption and mismanagement ate away the successes of the industry.

Google new privacy policy receives criticism

Google rolled out its new privacy policy yesterday allowing the firm to track users across various services to develop targeted advertising,despite sharp criticism from US and European consumer advocacy groups. Google contends the move simplifies and unifies its policies across its various services such as Gmail,YouTube,Android mobile systems,social networks and Internet search. “The new policy doesn’t change any existing privacy settings or how any personal information is shared outside of Google,”Google privacy chief Alma Whitten said on the Google Blog today.

But critics including European privacy agencies and US consumer watchdogs argued the new policy,which offers no ability to opt out aside from refraining from signing into Google services,gives the Internet giant unprecedented ability to monitor its users. “Calling this a ‘privacy policy’is Orwellian doublespeak,”said John Simpson of the US advocacy group Consumer Watchdog. “Google isn’t telling you about protecting your privacy. Google is telling you how they will gather information about you on all its services,combine it in new ways and use the fat new digital dossiers to sell more ads. They’re telling you how they plan to spy on you. It’s a spy policy.”

Cabinet approves lifting trade barriers with India

Image

Pakistan announced a goal of normalizing trade with India by the end of the year, a gesture that is part of tentative attempts to improve relations between the nuclear-armed neighbors.

In a statement Wednesday, the office of Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani said the government planned to phase out major restrictions on Indian imports by Jan. 1, 2013.

Pakistan recently scrapped a system of allowing imports of fewer than 2,000 items from India. It moved instead to a "negative list," which bans around 600 items from India but allows trade in all other goods.

Why are Pakistanis hating on Misbah?

First of all,let me apologize for the misleading headline. This is not a hate article about Misbahul Haq,nor is it one which supports him. When Pakistan lost to England,almost all of us decided to blame him for the defeat. Like all of our country’s misfortunes and losses,we decided to make our captain the scapegoat.

Let us recall the events that culminated in Pakistan’s defeat. We had an opener (Hafeez) who didn’t score a single run,Afridi who got run out for three and didn’t take any wickets,Umar Gul who got hit around by Pietersen,a pitch as dead as a Pakistani politician’s honesty and Cheema who bowled a lollypop of a full toss in the last over.

Who will be the next DG ISI?

It’s appointment time at the Fortress on 7th Avenue. Pakistan’s premier intelligence arm, the Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, is transitioning through a change of the guard. After an unprecedented two...

It’s appointment time at the Fortress on 7th Avenue. Pakistan’s premier intelligence arm, the Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, is transitioning through a change of the guard. After an unprecedented two extensions at the helm of the ISI, infantryman (or as he prefers it, Piffer) Lt. Gen. Ahmad Shuja Pasha is getting ready for golfing. Or is he?

The deadline for the switchover is March 18th, the day Pasha says goodbye to his Aabpara staff of at least six sub-directorates (‘Analysis’, ‘Counter’, ‘Internal’, ‘Media’, ‘Special’ & ‘Technical’) and goes packing. Assuming he will either not be offered an extension (which has to officially come from the office of the prime ninister), nor accept an extension if it is offered (which may be likely as it will make him look good and the PM/government seem thankful and happy), the DG-I (preferred again, for only civilians call him DG-ISI) will be replaced by a man who will have to be battle-ready without the luxury of any ‘settling in’ period.